The Complete Penetration Testing Methodology: Frameworks That Matter

According to the latest IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, the global average stands at $4.44 million. These high-impact incidents often stem from a single, overlooked vulnerability, one that could have been discovered and mitigated with the right security testing.

This underscores the importance of a structured, proactive penetration testing methodology. It is not just about running automated tools. A true penetration test is a multi-phase, simulated attack, executed by certified ethical hackers to uncover real, exploitable weaknesses before malicious actors do.

This guide dives deep into the most important penetration testing methodologies that security professionals use today.

What Is Penetration Testing and Why Does Methodology Matter?

Penetration testing, or pen testing, is a simulated cyberattack on a system, network, or application to identify and exploit vulnerabilities before malicious actors can. A structured methodology is the backbone of an effective pen test. It transforms a chaotic, ad-hoc attempt into a disciplined, thorough, and repeatable process.

A solid methodology is essential because it:

• Ensures comprehensive coverage of your entire attack surface.
• Standardizes practices across internal teams and third-party vendors.
• Helps meet critical regulatory and compliance requirements like PCI DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2.
• Produces reliable, actionable results that can be used to prioritize and fix vulnerabilities.

Let us dive into the key frameworks that are shaping modern penetration testing.

1. PTES – Penetration Testing Execution Standard

Overview:

The Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES) is an industry-recognized standard designed to provide a comprehensive, end-to-end framework for pen tests. It is highly valued for its detailed, phased approach that ensures consistency and thoroughness.

Key Phases:

PTES breaks down the pen testing process into seven distinct stages:

1. Pre-engagement Interactions: This crucial first step defines the scope, rules of engagement, timelines, and legal agreements.
2. Intelligence Gathering: Testers perform reconnaissance to gather as much information as possible about the target, using both passive (OSINT) and active scanning techniques.
3. Threat Modeling: Based on the gathered intelligence, testers identify potential threat actors and map out likely attack vectors.
4. Vulnerability Analysis: Using a combination of automated scanners and manual techniques, testers systematically identify and validate weaknesses.
5. Exploitation: The core of the test, where testers attempt to exploit discovered vulnerabilities to demonstrate their real-world impact.
6. Post-Exploitation: Once a vulnerability is exploited, testers assess the true value of the compromised system, attempt to maintain access, and perform lateral movement to identify further weaknesses.
7. Reporting: The final phase involves documenting all findings, including the identified vulnerabilities, the methods used to exploit them, and clear, prioritized recommendations for remediation.

Why Use PTES:

PTES is ideal for large-scale, enterprise-level engagements where a structured and auditable process is essential. It emphasizes clear communication between testers and stakeholders and is highly adaptable to different types of tests, from network to application security.

Check out how to perform pen testing in detail.

2. OWASP Testing Guide – The Application Security Standard

Overview:

The OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) Testing Guide is the definitive methodology for assessing the security of web applications and APIs. It is a critical companion to the well-known OWASP Top 10 list,  providing detailed testing scenarios to uncover the most common and critical application risks. The guide is continually updated by a global community of experts to reflect the latest threats.

Key Areas Covered:

The guide organizes testing into categories that directly address application-specific vulnerabilities:

• Input Validation & Injection vulnerabilities: Testing for weaknesses like SQLi, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and Command Injection.
• Authentication & Session Management: Assessing the security of user authentication processes, password policies, and session tokens.
• Authorization & Access Controls: Verifying that users can only access the data and functions they are permitted to.
• Business Logic Vulnerabilities: Identifying vulnerabilities in the application’s unique business logic that could be abused.
• API Misconfigurations: Focusing on vulnerabilities specific to modern APIs, which are a common attack vector.

Why Use OWASP:

The OWASP Testing Guide is the gold standard for organizations that build or use web applications. It is a must-have for SaaS providers, FinTech companies, and e-commerce platforms, and it is widely accepted for compliance with standards like PCI DSS and SOC 2.

3. NIST SP 800-115 – Technical Guide to Information Security Testing

Overview:

Published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), SP 800-115 is a formal, government-backed guide for conducting information security testing and assessments. It provides a methodical framework that is particularly relevant for the U.S. public sector and other regulated industries.

Key Phases:

NIST SP 800-115 outlines a four-phase process for security testing:

1. Planning: This phase involves defining the scope, goals, and legal considerations, including getting official authorization to perform the test.
2. Discovery: Testers use techniques like network scanning, vulnerability scanning, and log reviews to discover systems and identify potential weaknesses.
3. Attack: This phase involves attempting to exploit discovered vulnerabilities to demonstrate the risk they pose to the organization. Examples include password cracking, privilege escalation, and social engineering attacks.
4. Reporting: All findings are documented in a formal report that includes a risk analysis, an executive summary, and recommendations for remediation.

Why Use NIST SP 800-115:

This framework is perfect for audit-driven environments and organizations that need formal documentation to prove compliance with regulations like HIPAA, FedRAMP, and FISMA. It provides a clear, defensible methodology that aligns testing efforts with a broader risk management strategy.

4. OSSTMM – The Auditable & Measurable Approach

Overview:

The Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM), maintained by the Institute for Security and Open Methodologies (ISECOM), is a peer-reviewed methodology focused on measurable and auditable security testing. It is unique for its holistic approach, covering not just technical systems but also physical and human security.

Unique Concepts:

OSSTMM introduces two key concepts:

• RAV (Risk Assessment Values): A quantitative measurement for risk, allowing for a more scientific and repeatable evaluation of security posture.
• Security Trust Analysis: A measure of how much a system or process can be trusted, which goes beyond simply identifying vulnerabilities.

Why Use OSSTMM:

OSSTMM is for organizations that want a truly comprehensive view of their security. It is ideal for maturing security programs and for audits that need to go beyond standard network or web app testing to include operational and physical security. Its focus on metrics helps organizations measure their progress over time.

5. MITRE ATT&CK – Threat-Informed Penetration Testing

Overview:

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is not a traditional pen testing methodology, but a powerful knowledge base of real-world adversary tactics and techniques. It is used to create threat-informed pen tests and red team simulations that emulate the behaviors of known threat groups. Instead of a linear process, it is a matrix of how attackers operate.

Key Components:

• Tactics: The attacker’s high-level objectives, such as Initial Access, Persistence, or Lateral Movement.
• Techniques: The specific ways attackers achieve those objectives, like “Phishing” or “PowerShell Abuse.”
• Procedures: Detailed, real-world examples of how a technique has been used by a specific threat group.

Why Use MITRE ATT&CK:

ATT&CK is great for organizations that have a mature security program and want to test their defenses against realistic threats. It helps security teams validate their ability to detect and respond to known adversary behaviors, turning pen testing into a strategic exercise that strengthens an organization’s security operations center (SOC). It is used to complement other frameworks like PTES or OWASP by providing a more realistic attack simulation.

Frameworks in Modern Pen Testing: A Comparison

Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Framework

Penetration testing frameworks are not one-size-fits-all. Each has its strengths and is designed for a specific purpose. The key is to select a methodology or a blend of them that aligns with your specific business context, industry requirements, and risk tolerance.

• For a comprehensive, structured test of your entire IT environment, PTES is an excellent choice.
• If securing your web applications is a top priority, the OWASP Testing Guide is essential.
• When formal documentation and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable, NIST SP 800-115 provides a robust and defensible framework.
• To go beyond technical tests and measure security across your entire organization, including physical and human aspects, OSSTMM is the way to go.
• For advanced threat simulation and validating your security operations, a test aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework is invaluable.

By adopting a strategic, framework-based approach, you can transform your pen testing from a simple compliance checkbox into a powerful tool for building a more resilient and secure organization.

Ready to secure your business with a tailored penetration testing strategy? Let us know what your biggest security concerns are, and we can help you find a testing methodology that works for you.

Stay tuned for more relevant and interesting security articles. Follow Indusface on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.