15 minute Attack Simulation : From Safe to Compromised - The Hidden Risk in Software Supply Chains - Register Now!

How Often Should You Conduct a Penetration Test?

Posted DateJuly 25, 2025
Posted Time 5   min Read

While vulnerability scans show what is exposed, penetration tests reveal what can be exploited. But how often should you conduct a pen test?

This blog helps you determine the right frequency based on your risk level, system changes, and threat exposure, so you can stay ahead of potential attacks.

Why Penetration Testing Frequency Matters

Modern attackers do not wait for compliance windows; they continuously scan the internet for known vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed assets. To match that pace, security testing must evolve from being a one-time activity to an ongoing process.

Automated vulnerability scanning is great for catching common vulnerabilities at scale, but it lacks the human intuition needed to exploit logic vulnerabilities, bypass controls, or combine low-risk vulnerabilities into serious threats. That is where manual penetration testing comes in; it simulates how a real attacker would break into your systems. It goes beyond identification to assess exploitability, revealing how multiple vulnerabilities could be chained together, or how a seemingly minor vulnerability could expose sensitive data when combined with business logic vulnerabilities.

As cyber threats evolve and digital environments become more complex, the frequency of pen testing plays a crucial role in minimizing risk, maintaining compliance, and supporting cyber insurance readiness.

1. Keeps Pace with Evolving Threats

Cybercriminals are constantly developing new attack methods. A vulnerability that seemed low-risk last month may become a prime target today. Frequent pentesting ensures your defenses adapt to the latest threat intelligence.

The more often you test, the quicker you can spot and close newly exploitable gaps.

2. Aligns with Development Velocity

In modern DevOps and agile environments, code changes, feature releases, and third-party integrations happen often. With every change, there is potential for new vulnerabilities.

The faster you release, the more frequently you should test.

3. Meets the Compliance Requirements

Regulations such as PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, and HIPAA mandate regular penetration testing, often annually or after significant changes.

  • PCI DSS v4.0 – Requirement 11.4.3: Requires external and internal penetration testing at least annually and after any significant infrastructure or application upgrade or modification.
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 – Control A.12.6.1 (Technical Vulnerability Management): Requires testing of information systems to identify technical vulnerabilities and take appropriate action.
  • HIPAA Security Rule – 45 CFR §164.308(a)(8): Requires regular technical and non-technical evaluations, which may include penetration testing, to ensure compliance with security policies and procedures.

Regular testing shows maturity and risk awareness leading to smoother audits and potentially lower insurance premiums.

4. Reduces Exposure Window

The time between a vulnerability being introduced and discovered is called the exposure window. Less frequent tests mean longer periods where vulnerabilities can remain undetected.

Frequent pentests shrink this window, reducing the likelihood and impact of an attack.

5. Validates Remediation and Continuous Improvement

Post-remediation testing ensures that identified vulnerabilities are effectively fixed and that new ones have not been introduced in the process.

Frequent testing validates past efforts and strengthens future security decisions.

Recommended Penetration Testing Frequency

There is no one-size-fits-all answer, but here are common recommendations based on industry practices and security maturity:

1. Annually (At Minimum)

Most industry standards and compliance frameworks (e.g., PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA) recommend at least one penetration test per year to ensure you are addressing evolving risks.

  1. Major Infrastructure or Application Changes
    You should conduct a pen test every time there is a significant change to your:
  • Application code
  • Infrastructure
  • Network architecture
  • Third-party integrations

These changes could introduce new vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.

3. After Security Incidents

If you have experienced a breach or critical vulnerability, a pen test is essential to assess the current state and validate that the vulnerability has been fully addressed.

4. Quarterly or Bi-Annually (for High-Risk Industries)

Industries dealing with sensitive data (e.g., finance, healthcare, e-commerce) should test more frequently (quarterly or bi-annually) to ensure constant vigilance against sophisticated threats.

5. Ongoing Testing (Continuous or On-Demand)

With DevOps and agile environments, many organizations adopt continuous testing or penetration testing as a service (PTaaS). This enables:

  • Immediate testing after updates
  • Real-time remediation
  • Consistent coverage for dynamic apps

Recommended Penetration Testing Frequency by Risk Profile

Organization Type / Risk Profile Suggested Testing Frequency
Regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, govt) Quarterly
High-velocity SaaS or e-commerce Quarterly or after every major release
Mid-size tech companies or startups Biannually or after significant updates
SMEs with stable infrastructure Annually (minimum)

These are general guidelines. Actual testing cadence should reflect your risk appetite, application complexity, and rate of change.

Factors that influence Penetration Testing Frequency

1. Business Type and Size

Industries like finance, healthcare, and SaaS face higher risk and stricter scrutiny. Larger or fast-growing organizations may need more frequent testing to keep pace with expanding attack surfaces.

2. Cloud Migrations or Third-Party Integrations

Shifting to cloud environments or external services can expose misconfigurations or authentication gaps. Penetration testing helps validate new exposures introduced during such transitions.

3. Security Patches to Critical Systems

Patches can sometimes introduce new vulnerabilities or fail to fully resolve the original vulnerability. Post-patch testing ensures the fix is effective and has not created regressions.

4. Product or Feature Releases

New features can bring changes in logic, roles, or input handling, leading to vulnerabilities scanners might miss. Testing confirms these updates do not introduce exploitable vulnerabilities.

5. Policy or Permission Changes

Changes to access controls may unintentionally grant excessive privileges. Penetration testing helps verify that least-privilege policies are still enforced

6. Internal Risk Tolerance

Organizations with low risk tolerance, or those handling sensitive data, may test more frequently to minimize exposure and enforce stronger security posture.

Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning Frequency

It is important to distinguish penetration testing from automated scanning:

Type Purpose Frequency
Vulnerability Scanning Identifies known CVEs and misconfigurations Weekly or monthly
Penetration Testing Simulates real-world attacks to exploit vulnerabilities Annually, quarterly, or after major changes

Both are necessary. Scanners provide continuous monitoring, while pen tests dive deep into real-world exploit scenarios.

Revalidation: A Step That Should Not Be Missed

Fixing a vulnerability does not guarantee the risk is resolved. Unless a retest is performed, there is no assurance that the vulnerability has been fully addressed or that no new problems were introduced during the remediation.

In complex applications, it is common for similar code or logic to be reused across different modules. A patch applied in one area might leave the same vulnerability active elsewhere. There is also the risk of partial fixes, where surface-level symptoms are resolved, but the root cause remains exploitable.

Revalidation helps answer critical questions:

  • Was the fix applied correctly across all affected components?
  • Has the vulnerability been eliminated in full, not just suppressed?
  • Did the fix create any unintended behavior or open up new risks?

This step also supports internal security reviews and external compliance audits by providing documented assurance that known vulnerabilities were resolved as intended.

A structured retesting process, ideally integrated with your existing testing workflow, ensures that security fixes lead to actual risk reduction. It should be a standard part of any mature vulnerability management program, not a secondary task left to assumption.

Indusface WAS: Combining Automation with Expert Validation

Indusface WAS offers a comprehensive suite of testing capabilities across websites, APIs, and mobile applications.

The platform offers a comprehensive approach to application security by combining automated vulnerability scanning with expert-driven manual penetration testing and continuous revalidation. The automated scanner quickly detects known vulnerabilities and misconfigurations across your web applications, helping security teams maintain visibility and stay ahead of emerging threats. However, what truly sets Indusface apart is the integration of manual penetration testing by certified security experts who go beyond surface-level checks to uncover complex vulnerabilities such as business logic vulnerabilities, zero-day exposures, and exploitable risks that automated tools often miss.

This hybrid model ensures that every vulnerability flagged is manually verified for exploitability, eliminating false positives and giving security and development teams the confidence to act swiftly. Once vulnerabilities are fixed, Indusface does not stop there. It performs revalidation to confirm whether the remediation was successful, ensuring a clean slate for compliance and audit readiness.

From discovery to validation and continuous rechecking, Indusface WAS offers an end-to-end vulnerability management workflow that is ideal for DevSecOps environments, SaaS platforms, and regulated sectors. Combined with autonomous, instant vulnerability remediation through SwyftComply, it delivers real-time protection and clean audit reporting without slowing down innovation.

Testing frequency is not just about meeting compliance. It is about knowing where you stand, before attackers do. Secure your apps now!

Start a free trial of Indusface WAS or book a manual pen test with our experts.

 

Stay tuned for more relevant and interesting security articles. Follow Indusface on FacebookTwitter, and LinkedIn.

AppTrana WAAP

Vinugayathri - Senior Content Writer
Vinugayathri Chinnasamy

Vinugayathri is a dynamic marketing professional specializing in tech content creation and strategy. Her expertise spans cybersecurity, IoT, and AI, where she simplifies complex technical concepts for diverse audiences. At Indusface, she collaborates with cross-functional teams to produce high-quality marketing materials, ensuring clarity and consistency in every piece.

Share Article:

Join 51000+ Security Leaders

Get weekly tips on blocking ransomware, DDoS and bot attacks and Zero-day threats.

We're committed to your privacy. indusface uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

Related Posts

penetration Testing
Can Penetrating Testing Help Secure Your Business?

Every company need penetration test to uncover possible weaknesses, and address them one by one in a systematic manner. Read more.

Read More

AppTrana

Fully Managed SaaS-Based Web Application Security Solution

Get free access to Integrated Application Scanner, Web Application Firewall, DDoS & Bot Mitigation, and CDN for 14 days

Get Started for Free Request a Demo

Gartner

Indusface is the only cloud WAAP (WAF) vendor with 100% customer recommendation for 4 consecutive years.

A Customers’ Choice for 2024, 2023 and 2022 - Gartner® Peer Insights™

The reviews and ratings are in!