Choosing a Penetration Testing Service Company: 13 Critical Questions to Ask

In cybersecurity, a single overlooked vulnerability can unravel your defenses. The 2025 Verizon DBIR shows that vulnerabilities now account for 20% of breaches as the initial access point, emphasizing that proactive penetration testing is no longer optional; it is critical.

Yet not all penetration testing providers are created equal. Some deliver generic, automated scans with minimal context, while others offer deep, manual assessments that replicate real-world attack tactics. Choosing the right partner can mean the difference between catching a vulnerability early and finding it in a breach report.

If you want a provider who delivers real security value (not just a PDF report), here are critical questions you should ask penetration testing service providers before signing a contract.

How to Find the Best Website Penetration Testing Services?

1. Do They Offer Both Automated and Manual Testing?

Automated vulnerability scanners are essential for breadth and speed, but they cannot replicate the creativity and adaptability of a human attacker. Many real-world exploits, especially those involving chained vulnerabilities or unique business workflows require an experienced tester who thinks like a hacker.

When evaluating a penetration testing provider, find out if they combine automated scans with manual testing. Automated scans will cover many common vulnerabilities quickly, but manual testing digs deeper, testing for context-specific vulnerabilities that automation alone misses.

Indusface WAS takes a hybrid approach that blends the best of automation with expert-led manual penetration testing. Its AI-powered crawler intelligently maps your application’s entire attack surface, identifying hidden pages, complex navigation paths, and dynamic elements that traditional crawlers may miss. The platform’s automated scans provide comprehensive coverage of known vulnerabilities, while certified security analysts manually investigate complex attack scenarios, business logic vulnerabilities, and emerging threats. This ensures that vulnerabilities are validated by human experts, drastically reducing false positives and ensuring every reported issue is real and actionable.

Indusface WAS’s manual testing process includes application logic mapping, where security experts trace the way data and user actions flow through your application. This enables them to uncover non-standard vulnerabilities, such as promotion abuse, privilege escalations and flawed authorization checks, and workflow bypasses, that could result in revenue loss or compliance violations.

2. Is Malware Detection Included?

Many penetration testing services focus solely on coding vulnerabilities while ignoring malicious code injections and infections. This is a major gap search engines like Google quickly blacklist infected websites, causing reputational and financial damage.

Indusface WAS continuously scans your websites and applications for malware in addition to traditional vulnerabilities. Any malicious code, injected scripts, or suspicious files are flagged for immediate removal, reducing the risk of being blacklisted or inadvertently spreading malware to your users.

3. Can They Share a Detailed Testing Plan?

Professional penetration testing is a process, not a one-off scan. Reputable vendors provide a documented testing plan that outlines the phases, timelines, and follow-up procedures.

Indusface WAS begins with a thorough scoping and planning stage, where all assets are cataloged, credentials documented, and test objectives agreed upon. The testing process is clearly communicated, including when scans will run, how manual testing will be conducted, and when reports will be delivered. This transparency ensures there are no surprises and that the testing aligns with your operational schedules.

4. What are the qualifications of the testers assigned to your project?

When choosing a penetration testing partner, do not settle for generic company certifications. The real value lies in the credentials, experience, and regulatory recognition of the individuals performing the test.

Key considerations:

CERT-IN Recognition:

Ensure that the testers are empaneled by CERT-IN (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team). This empanelment indicates that the testers meet Indian government standards for cybersecurity assessments, providing both credibility and compliance assurance.

CERT-IN recognized testers help organizations demonstrate adherence to regulatory expectations, which is particularly important for enterprises in sectors like finance, insurance, and critical infrastructure.

Industry Engagement:

Beyond certifications, assess whether the testers actively contribute to the cybersecurity community.

Examples include publishing security research, contributing to open-source security projects, or speaking at cybersecurity conferences.

Active engagement demonstrates that testers are not only certified but also practically proficient and aware of emerging threats.

5. Which testing standards and methodologies guide their assessments?

Without a defined methodology, testing may skip crucial steps, miss vulnerabilities, or produce inconsistent results. A transparent process gives you confidence that the assessment is thorough and that findings are reproducible and defensible, something auditors and stakeholders value.

A reputable vendor should follow a documented, repeatable methodology rather than running unstructured tests. Ask them to walk you through their process, which should include reconnaissance, vulnerability analysis, exploitation, post-exploitation, and detailed reporting.

They should also align with recognized frameworks such as NIST, PTES, or OWASP Top 10. This demonstrates a structured, industry-accepted approach rather than ad-hoc testing.

Check out the penetration testing methodologies in details.

6.  How Strong Is Their Reporting?

A penetration test is only as valuable as its report. You need reports that are not only accurate but also easy to interpret, actionable, and structured for different audiences from technical developers to executive leadership.

A strong report should include:

• An executive summary written in non-technical language for decision-makers
• Detailed technical findings with proof-of-concept examples
• Risk-based prioritization to help focus remediation efforts
• Actionable, step-by-step remediation guidance

If a vendor cannot or will not provide a sanitized sample report, consider it a red flag.

Indusface WAS provides intuitive, audit-ready reports through a centralized dashboard. These reports can be separated into manual pen-test findings or combined with automated scan results for a holistic view. You can track historical data, view graphical vulnerability trends, and export detailed results instantly. This makes compliance audits easier and provides a clear vulnerability history for long-term security planning.

7. Will They Support Remediation?

Finding vulnerabilities is only part of the value. A good vendor will help ensure those vulnerabilities are fixed effectively.

Ask if they offer post-test support to clarify findings, answer technical questions, and validate remediations. Many reputable firms provide a free retest for critical or high-risk vulnerabilities. Without this follow-up, you may never know if your environment is truly secure after remediation.

Indusface WAS goes beyond just pointing out vulnerabilities, it actively helps you close them. Indusface’s security experts work directly with your teams to explain findings, guide remediation, and ensure fixes are applied correctly. The platform also offers retesting after each remediation cycle, confirming that vulnerabilities are truly resolved before they are marked as closed.

In addition, through SwyftComply, the platform enables autonomous remediation of identified vulnerabilities via instant virtual patching. This means critical vulnerabilities can be mitigated immediately, reducing the exposure window even before a permanent fix is deployed by your development team.

8. How Do They Handle False Positives?

False positives are one of the most frustrating aspects of penetration testing. They occur when a tool flags something as a vulnerability that, in reality, poses no risk. While this might sound harmless, the impact is significant your development team wastes valuable time chasing non-issues, security priorities get diluted, and overall trust in the testing process erodes. In high-pressure environments, too many false positives can even cause “alert fatigue,” where real threats are overlooked because teams are overwhelmed with noise.

Indusface WAS addresses this problem head-on through a combination of AI-powered analysis and manual validation for every vulnerability before it appears in your report. The process begins with advanced AI algorithms that analyze scan results, correlate findings, and filter out patterns commonly associated with false positives. This ensures that only high-probability vulnerabilities are escalated for further review.

Once AI narrows down the list, Indusface’s certified security experts step in to manually verify each flagged issue in a controlled environment, using the same methods an attacker might employ. This two-tiered approach (AI precision plus human expertise) ensures that only vulnerabilities confirmed as exploitable make it to your final report.

9. How do they prioritize findings?

If you use remediation mechanisms like SwyftComply, you need not spend time on prioritizing vulnerabilities as all of them will be virtually patched instantly. If you do not use such a mechanism, you will need to prioritize as not all vulnerabilities carry the same level of risk. The best vendors prioritize findings based on both the potential impact and the likelihood of exploitation in your specific environment, rather than relying only on generic CVSS scores.

Ask them to explain their prioritization methodology. This ensures you can address the most dangerous risks first, especially when resources are limited.

With Indusface WAS, prioritization goes beyond generic scoring. Each finding undergoes risk assessment via AcuRisQ which factors in:

• Asset criticality – How important is the affected system to your business operations?
• Exploit likelihood – How easily could a real attacker exploit this vulnerability?
• Business impact – Could exploitation lead to data breaches, downtime, or compliance violations?

This approach means you focus your resources on fixing the most dangerous risks first, rather than wasting time on low-impact vulnerabilities. For teams with limited bandwidth, this risk-based prioritization is essential to improving security posture quickly and effectively.

10. How do you handle sensitive data discovered during the test?

Penetration tests often involve accessing sensitive information, whether personal data, financial records, or proprietary business information. You need to know how the vendor will store, transmit, and ultimately destroy this data.

They should have strict security protocols in place, use encryption for all stored and transmitted data, and be willing to sign a robust Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).

11. What is their communication plan during the engagement?

Clear and timely communication is essential. You should have a dedicated point of contact and a defined plan for regular updates.

Ask whether they will notify you immediately if a critical vulnerability is discovered, rather than waiting until the final report. This allows you to take urgent action to protect your systems without delay.

12. Can they provide client references from your industry?

Speaking to a current or past client in your sector can help you verify the vendor’s claims.

Ask references about the quality of the report, the professionalism of the testers, their responsiveness, and whether they uncovered vulnerabilities that previous assessments had missed. This feedback will give you a realistic picture of what to expect.

13. What is your pricing model, and what factors determine the final cost?

Unusually low prices can signal over-reliance on automated tools or less experienced testers. A trustworthy vendor will provide a clear proposal outlining the scope, methodology, timelines, and all costs.

Ask how variables like the number of assets, testing complexity, and type of assessment will influence the price. This transparency will help you compare vendors on value rather than just cost.

Red Flags to Watch For

• Vendors who offer only automated scans with no manual testing
• Unwillingness to share sample reports or client references
• Lack of relevant certifications among the testing team
• Vague or undocumented methodologies
• No clear plan for data security or secure communication

Choosing the right penetration testing company means finding a partner that understands your business risks, offers deep manual expertise alongside automation, provides actionable and prioritized reporting, and integrates with your broader security strategy.

With Indusface WAS, you get more than a test, you get continuous, risk-based protection, supported by human expertise and backed by real-time defenses through its WAAP integration.

Secure your website with penetration testing that works as hard as attackers do. Get a Free Website Security Scan with Indusface WAS

Stay tuned for more relevant and interesting security articles. Follow Indusface on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.