How to Automate API Security Testing During CI/CD

During the first half of 2025, APIs faced significantly higher number of attacks than traditional web applications. On average, attacks per API host were 72% higher than those targeting websites, and exploitation of API vulnerabilities surged 13× compared to a 27% increase for website vulnerabilities, according to the State of Application Security Global H1 2025.

When vulnerabilities are discovered only after deployment, they are harder to fix, more disruptive to remediate, and often exposed long enough for attackers to take advantage. This is why API security must move directly into the CI/CD pipeline. Automated testing integrated into development ensures that every release is validated, every change is scrutinized, and vulnerabilities are caught before they ever reach production.

Why API Security Testing Must Move Into CI/CD

Traditional application security was designed for slower release cycles with manual, post-development testing. Modern API-driven development requires continuous delivery, fast patching, and automated verification, which is why security must shift left into the CI/CD pipeline.

1. Late Discovery Increases Remediation Costs

When vulnerabilities are discovered only after deployment, fixing them becomes significantly harder. The code is already integrated with other components, may be running in production, and resolving the vulnerabilities might require rewrites, rollbacks, or architectural changes. The longer a vulnerability remains undetected, the more expensive and disruptive it is to address.

2. Manual Security Reviews Cause Bottlenecks

Traditional security processes rely heavily on manual effort, code reviews, penetration tests, and compliance checks. As release frequency increases, security teams cannot manually validate every change at the required speed. This slows deployment pipelines, delays releases, and creates friction between engineering and security.

3. Developers Lose Context Over Time

When vulnerabilities are reported weeks after the code was written, the original developer may no longer remember the logic behind the implementation. They must re-read modules, reload context, and rebuild understanding from scratch. This slows down remediation and increases the chances of incomplete or incorrect fixes.

4. New APIs Can Reach Production Without Safeguards

Modern applications frequently add new endpoints, integrations, and data exchange flows. If security validation only happens late in the pipeline, new APIs may enter production without proper checks for:

• Authentication
• Authorization
• Input validation
• Encryption
• Rate limiting
• Sensitive data handling

Such gaps often go unnoticed until exploited in a live environment.

5. CI/CD Demands Higher Automation

The software delivery pipeline already automates builds, unit tests, deployments, and packaging. If security remains manual, it becomes the slowest and least scalable part of the chain. Automated security ensures consistent, reliable testing at the pace of modern engineering.

6. Security and Engineering Must Work in Alignment

DevSecOps requires shared responsibility. Security must be embedded directly into daily workflows, coding, testing, deployment, and continuous monitoring. Automation enables this integration, ensuring that strong security controls are enforced without slowing development velocity.

7. Faster Patch Validation and Continuous Regression Testing

After a fix is applied, the CI/CD pipeline automatically re-runs security tests. If the vulnerability is resolved, the build proceeds. If not, developers get immediate feedback. Over time, this builds a growing regression suite that continuously protects the application from recurring vulnerabilities, strengthening security with every release.

How to Integrate API Security Testing Into CI/CD

Integrating automated API security checks into CI/CD is not just a tooling decision, it is a shift in operating model. The goal is to make security continuous, measurable, and predictable, so vulnerabilities are identified during development rather than after release.

A successful integration follows a structured approach.

1. Build a Complete API Inventory and Prioritize Risk

You cannot secure what you cannot see. The first step is cataloging all APIs, internal, external, partner-facing, and legacy services, and classifying them based on exposure and criticality.

For each API, define:

• Who can access it
• What data it handles
• What business services it impacts

Critical and public-facing APIs should have stricter security gates, while internal low-risk services may follow lighter testing policies. This prevents over-testing and ensures the riskiest assets receive maximum scrutiny.

2. Define Security Gates and Build Policies

Automated pipelines need rules that determine what is acceptable and what fails a release. These include:

• Which API vulnerability severities will block a build
• Which issues trigger alerts but don’t halt deployment
• Maximum acceptable risk thresholds
• Exception handling and approval flows

With clearly defined policies, security enforcement becomes consistent and predictable instead of manual and subjective.

3. Prepare Secure and Realistic Test Environments

To test meaningfully, API security testing automation must run in environments that behave like production. This includes:

• Staging systems with realistic data and configurations
• Secure handling of secrets, API keys, tokens, and service credentials
• Network paths that mimic deployment flows

4. Automate Scans and Validate Results

Start small and scale gradually. Early integration can begin with:

• Core authentication and authorization checks
• High-impact vulnerability scans
• Tests on a small set of APIs or functionality

Run the results against known vulnerabilities to validate accuracy and tune false positives. As confidence builds, expand coverage to more services, broader test suites, and deeper logic validation.

5. Expand Coverage and Maintain Continuous Monitoring

Once the pipeline is stable, automation should scale to all deployment environments, including integration, staging, and production. Teams should regularly analyze API scan reports to identify:

• Recurring coding patterns
• Weak architectural decisions
• New or expanding API threat trends

What Should Be Tested Automatically?

Automation does not mean testing everything all the time. It means running high-impact tests frequently enough to prevent risky code from reaching production.

Recommended automated checks include:

• Authentication and Authorization- Validating session controls, token integrity, and privilege boundaries
• Input Validation-Identifying injection, malformed payloads, and unsafe deserialization
• Data Security-Verifying HTTPS usage, encryption settings, and secure storage
• API Rate Limits and Abuse Controls-Ensuring DoS and brute force protections are in place
• Platform Configuration-Detecting weak headers, open CORS settings, insecure HTTP verbs
• Workflow Logic Validation-Ensuring users cannot bypass multi-step flows or jump privilege levels

Measuring Success: Key CI/CD API Security Metrics

Tracking the right KPIs shows whether automation is effective and where to improve next.

Indusface’s API Scanner integrates seamlessly with CI/CD systems like Jenkins and ticketing tools like Jira, ensuring every detected vulnerability automatically becomes a trackable task. This eliminates manual reporting, reduces MTTR, and keeps development, QA, and security teams aligned on remediation timelines. Automated ticket creation also maintains a clean audit trail and ensures no API risk slips through unnoticed. With autonomous vulnerability remediation, critical vulnerability can be instantly patched at the edge, ensuring protection even before developers apply code fixes.

Stay tuned for more relevant and interesting security articles. Follow Indusface on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.