LLMs, Quantum Computing, and the Top Challenges for CISOs in 2026

Cybersecurity in 2026 is entering its most transformative and volatile phase yet. For CISOs, the landscape is no longer defined only by web, network, and cloud threats. Instead, attackers now target AI/LLM systems, APIs, identity platforms, SaaS ecosystems and supply chains.

The surge in attacks across applications, APIs, and GenAI systems indicates that adversaries are scaling faster, using automation, AI-assisted exploitation, and new social engineering vectors.

The blog revisit long-standing CISO pain points through a 2026 lens, layered with evolving attacker behavior, and industry-wide shifts.

State of Application Security Report Insights

Lack of Control over Digital Assets

According to the State of Application Security – Global H1 2025 report, organizations continue to struggle with comprehensive visibility across their digital environments. The findings show that SMBs faced 202% more website attacks than enterprises, and API DDoS attacks were 388% more frequent than website DDoS events, highlighting how rapidly expanding attack surfaces are increasing exposure. The report also notes a consistent rise in shadow assets discovered during external attack surface evaluations, signaling that a significant portion of digital infrastructure remains unidentified or unmanaged.

These observations align with broader industry trends where CISOs cite tool sprawl, multi-cloud decentralization, and the surge of unmanaged environments as leading contributors to visibility gaps.

A new layer of exposure has also emerged: Shadow AI.
This includes unapproved LLM plugins, autonomous agents, AI copilots, and employee-created GPTs that operate outside standard governance frameworks, creating new vectors for data leakage and misuse.

Long Vulnerability Exposure Windows

Across environments analyzed in H1 2025, more than 18,000 critical and high-severity vulnerabilities were identified.
Among these, over one-third remained unpatched for more than 180 days for various reasons including:

• rapid product and feature release cycles
• increasingly complex CI/CD pipelines
• reliance on third-party and open-source components
• AI-generated code introducing subtle logic flaws

Virtual patching continues to serve as a crucial safeguard providing immediate, real-time protection against exploit attempts while engineering teams work through longer software patch cycles.

The Rise in Cyber Attacks

The report recorded 4.8 billion attacks across monitored applications and APIs, a 14% increase year over year, demonstrating an escalating threat environment. It also notes 1.52 billion DDoS attacks and confirms that 90% of applications experienced bot-driven threats such as scraping, credential stuffing, and fraudulent transactions. Most notably, API-specific exploitation surged 13×, underscoring attackers’ growing focus on business logic, data-rich endpoints, and operational workflows.

As reflected in the report’s 2025 data, APIs and LLM-powered endpoints are now among the most targeted components in modern architectures. These systems often interact with sensitive backend data and are deployed at a pace that outstrips traditional security processes, making them high-value targets for adversaries.

This reinforces the need for continuous discovery, deeper runtime protection, and integrated WAAP security frameworks to safeguard applications and AI-driven services throughout 2026.

What are the Primary Challenges for CISOs?

1. Challenges in Security Management

Technology environments have become highly decentralized as organizations expand across multi-cloud platforms, SaaS applications, microservices, and LLM-integrated systems. This rapid growth has widened visibility gaps, with 74% of security leaders reporting fragmentation and tool overload.

AI adds additional complexity, security teams must now observe LLM inputs and outputs, monitor API calls triggered by autonomous agents, and assess how data flows through third-party AI tools.

What to do in 2026

• Adopt a platform-first, policy-driven approach that reduces operational complexity and strengthens visibility across modern application and AI ecosystems. A platform-first architecture that consolidates WAF, bot management, DDoS mitigation, API security, and AI traffic governance into a unified layer is now essential for consistent protection.
• Centralizing monitoring to achieve unified observability across web applications, APIs, and AI endpoints.
• Externalizing authorization and policy enforcement to simplify access control across distributed and rapidly changing architectures.

2. Skill Shortages and Management Complexity

The cybersecurity talent gap has been a persistent challenge for CISOs for more than a decade, but by 2025–2026, the gap has widened into a structural challenge. Teams are expected to secure cloud-native applications, AI-powered workflows, and high-velocity development pipelines, yet the market has very few professionals with deep expertise in AI/LLM security, API security, and cloud-native threat modeling. Even experienced SOC analysts are now overwhelmed, not only by alert volume and complexity but by completely new types of attacks generated through AI automation.

How CISOs are responding

• Leaning on fully managed services for WAF, DDoS protection, and bot mitigation to offload 24×7 monitoring and tuning.
• Partnering with vendors who bring people + process + technology, not just another tool.
• Upskilling existing teams on AI risk, API security, and cloud-native architectures instead of only hiring externally.

3. Timely Alert Response in the Cyber Threat Landscape

With microservices and cloud-native architectures, the attack surface updates faster than most detection rules. As APIs, LLM agents, and new SaaS tools are rolled out, the volume of alerts grows, but response capacity does not.

Delays in investigating alerts, especially around DDoS, API abuse, and LLM misuse lead to missed signals and, in some cases, full-blown incidents.

Key issues for CISOs includes:

• High reliance on manual triage
• Limited context tying together web, API, data, and identity logs
• Difficulty tracking attack campaigns that move between websites, APIs, and AI endpoints

What helps

• Risk-based alerting that prioritizes exploit attempts on known open vulnerabilities, not just generic noise.
• SOC playbooks tuned for DDoS, bot patterns, and LLM prompt-abuse scenarios.
• Clear communication channels between security, DevOps, and product teams for faster containment.

4. Security Practices Evolution Amid Digital Transformation

Digital transformation is now joined by AI transformation: chatbots, copilots, AI browsers, and automated agents are embedding into business workflows.

If security practices do not evolve, organizations inherit new GenAI risks on top of existing web and API threats:

• Data leakage from AI tools connected to internal systems
• Insecure AI integrations with CRMs, ticketing, or cloud storage
• Overreliance on AI-generated code without secure review

Security experts increasingly recommend WAAP and managed API security as foundational controls, then layering in AI-specific protections for LLM endpoints, such as input/output filtering and usage governance.

For DDoS, application-layer protections remain crucial, especially as APIs and AI endpoints become core to business availability.

5. Effective Balancing of Compliance and Communication

CISOs now operate under greater board scrutiny and rising regulatory expectations, including PCI DSS, the EU AI Act, India’s DPDP, and stricter GDPR enforcement. Each regulation introduces new expectations around data handling, AI governance, transparency, and risk reporting, increasing the need for clear and defensible security strategies.

Recommended Actions for Stronger Compliance and Communication

• Translate security outcomes into business metrics: downtime avoided, fraud prevented, regulatory penalties mitigated.
• Involve legal, compliance, and business leaders early when rolling out new AI or cloud initiatives.
• Treat security as a business enabler, especially around customer trust and digital resilience.

6. Asset Management

Gartner notes that less than 1% of organizations truly know where all their digital assets are. This figure is echoed by the state of application security report, showing SMBs suffer vastly more attacks per site than enterprises due to weaker visibility.

As organizations scale and adopt more collaboration platforms, SaaS apps, and cloud accounts, asset management becomes:

• Harder to centralize
• More critical for detecting shadow IT / shadow AI
• Essential for precise risk assessment and patching

Essential Considerations for Modern Asset Management

• Recognize that decentralized procurement (marketing tools, sales SaaS, AI assistants) is now the norm.
• Use attack surface management and automatic API discovery to map external exposure.
• Pair technical controls with continuous awareness so teams understand the risk of spinning up unsanctioned apps or LLM tools.

7. Alert Fatigue

Alert fatigue remains one of the most universal CISO challenges. With web, API, cloud, identity, and now AI/LLM security tools in play, teams can easily drown in notifications.

When everything looks urgent, critical alerts get ignored.

Effective strategies for 2026

• Prioritize by risk: focus on exploit attempts, data access anomalies, and high-value asset events first.
• Centralize alerts where possible and map them to business impact (e.g., payments API vs. marketing microsite).
• Educate development teams on secure coding and timely patching to reduce recurring noisy issues.
• Implement virtual patching and managed WAAP to auto-mitigate many attack patterns before they become incidents.
• Maintain a robust incident management process that complements preventive controls and clarifies escalation paths.

8. Rising LLM Threats

LLM adoption has exploded: from chatbots and copilots to AI browsers and autonomous agents. With that comes a new class of threats that adds yet another layer to existing CISO challenges, including:

• Prompt injection and indirect prompt injection
• Data exfiltration via AI tools connected to email, documents, and SaaS
• Jailbreaks that bypass safety guardrails
• AI-driven phishing, fraud, and misinformation campaigns

Recent incidents show how real these risks are:

• Security researchers demonstrated indirect prompt injection (“CometJacking”) against Perplexity’s Comet AI browser, allowing malicious prompts in URLs or webpages to exfiltrate user data from linked services like Gmail before being patched.
• Investigations into ChatGPT’s search capabilities showed that hidden instructions and fake content on web pages can manipulate AI-generated summaries, similar to SEO poisoning but targeting LLMs.
• New techniques like HashJack hide prompt injections in URL fragments, turning trusted sites into carriers for malicious AI instructions.
• Studies of models like DeepSeek’s R1 have shown near-100% success rates for jailbreak and prompt-injection attacks, underlining how fragile guardrails can be.

For CISOs, this means:

• Treat LLMs, AI browsers, and AI agents as sensitive endpoints, not just “smart UX”.
• Implement usage policies, data access controls, and output monitoring for employees using GenAI tools.
• Use solutions (like WAAP or AI-aware firewalls) that can inspect and govern LLM-related traffic, detect abuse patterns, and enforce data protection at the edge.

9. Third-Party Compliance in Security Incidents

Third-party engagements such as cloud providers, SaaS tools, managed services, AI vendors introduce:

• Data breach risk
• Compliance violations
• Operational disruptions and IP theft

As supply-chain style attacks and SaaS misconfigurations continue to grow, third-party and vendor risk rank consistently among the top CISO challenges.

Recommended Controls for Managing Third-Party Risk

• Run a vendor risk management program with regular security assessments and clear contractual security obligations.
• Align vendor data access and retention policies with your own regulatory requirements.
• Establish clear incident communication channels and ensure vendors participate in tabletop exercises.
• Pay special attention to AI and LLM vendors. Understand how they store prompts, logs, and training data, and what controls they provide.

10. Balancing Security and User Experience

Striking the right balance between robust security and frictionless UX remains a core challenge. Overly rigid controls drive users to shadow IT and shadow AI; weak controls invite breaches.

What works

• Embed security seamlessly into user workflows (SSO, phishing-resistant MFA, context-aware access) instead of intrusive add-ons.
• Design security controls with usability in mind and actively gather user feedback.
• Invest in data protection (encryption, tokenization) and strong identity controls so that tighter policies don’t always translate into clunky UX.
• Align UX, product, and security teams around a shared goal: resilient, trusted experiences that meet regulatory expectations (GDPR, Indian DPDPA, sectoral norms).

11. Risk from Quantum Computing

Quantum computing has shifted from a distant concept to a near-term strategic concern.

ISACA’s latest research shows:

• 67% of European IT professionals fear quantum will reshape cybersecurity risks.
• Only 4% of organizations have a defined quantum strategy.
• 67% worry that quantum capabilities could break today’s encryption before post-quantum cryptography (PQC) becomes standard.
• Quantum literacy remains extremely low, with only 2% feeling confident in their understanding.

To mitigate this:

• Apply data minimization: retain only what you genuinely need, for as long as regulations require.
• Track data movement between clouds and storage tiers; avoid forgotten buckets or “cheap glacier” archives holding sensitive data indefinitely.
• Introduce strong administrative controls and contractual clauses covering data handling, retention, and destruction, especially with cloud and SaaS providers.
• Start planning for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) by tracking evolving standards and prioritizing high-value systems for future migration.

These steps not only prepare you for quantum-era cryptography but also reduce current breach and compliance risk.

12. Ransomware-as-a-Service and Attack-as-a-Service Ecosystems

Cybercrime has industrialized. The rise of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), Phishing-as-a-Service, Botnets-for-hire, and Exploit-as-a-Service has lowered the barrier to entry for attackers. Threat actors no longer need deep technical expertise, everything from malware kits to DDoS botnets to LLM jailbreak prompts can be purchased on underground marketplaces.

Key 2026 trends include:

• AI-enhanced ransomware kits that dynamically evade detection using LLM-generated variants.
• Subscription-based botnets enabling massive DDoS attacks and automated credential stuffing.
• Prompt-Injection-as-a-Service, where attackers sell malicious prompt libraries designed to bypass LLM guardrails.
• Affiliate-driven RaaS models accelerating attack volume, scale, and specialization.

For CISOs, this means:

• Cyberattacks are faster to launch, harder to attribute, and cheaper to execute.
• Defenders must assume industrial-scale automation on the attacker’s side.

What helps:

• Proactive blocking through WAAP with real-time virtual patching to stop exploit kits from weaponizing known vulnerabilities.
• Managed DDoS protection to counter rented botnets.
• AI-aware traffic inspection (AppTrana AI-Shield) to detect malicious AI-generated payloads, prompt attacks, and automated exploitation patterns.
• Threat intelligence feeds focusing on emerging RaaS/AaaS campaigns.

How AppTrana Helps CISOs in 2026

AppTrana offers a unified, fully managed WAAP platform that brings together WAF, bot mitigation, DDoS protection, API security, virtual patching, and AI traffic governance, helping CISOs reduce tool sprawl and strengthen visibility across web, API, and AI endpoints.

With AppTrana AI-Shield, organizations gain centralized policy enforcement for all LLM interactions, inspecting prompts and responses, blocking unsafe inputs, and preventing sensitive data leakage. It adds a model-agnostic protection layer for public or private LLMs without requiring code changes.

Integrated bot protection detects automated prompt attacks, brute force attempts, scraping, and hostile AI agents, while 24×7 monitoring and incident investigation help ease alert fatigue and skill gaps. AppTrana also provides coverage for the OWASP LLM Top 10, including prompt injection and data exfiltration threats.

Trusted by 6500+ customers, AppTrana enables a cohesive, AI-ready application security strategy that strengthens resilience across traditional apps, APIs, and emerging GenAI workloads.

Want to modernize your AppSec and AI security stack? Start a Free trial of AppTrana.

Stay tuned for more relevant and interesting security articles. Follow Indusface on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.